Integrity Researchwatch has moved to
http://www.integrity-research.com/cms/researchwatch
Please update your bookmarks.



Subscribe to Integrity ResearchWatch by Email
or  in an RSS/XML reader

For those of you who don't know about Integrity Research Associates, we publish syndicated research reports; provide an online database of reviews, analysis and ratings on research firms; and offer specialized consulting about the equity research industry for professionals at money management, hedge fund, and broker / dealer firms. You can learn more about our company and our products / services at www.integrity-research.com.


Please feel free to contact us about our company, our products, or our services using the contact information below.
Integrity Research Associates, LLC
1115 Broadway, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10010

Tel: 212-845-9088
Fax: 212-845-9091
E-Mail: info@integrity-research.com
URL: www.integrity-research.com

Investorside Research Association


<< July 2007 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed



Thursday, May 08, 2008
A Level Playing Field, not Great for Bobsleders

New York – As early as Economics 101, we learn that the government is all thumbs in terms of hampering economic efficiency.  This is especially true in the area of financial market regulation.  In the investment community, most legislation is intended to protect the investor, especially the retail investor.  For the record, Integrity is squarely on the side of the investor, and the protections that they need to invest with confidence in the financial markets.  Still, there are a number of concerns in turning this intention into law.

Let's face it, the primary type of law making in this area is reactive. This means that the tendency to over-regulate is very probable, since regulations tend to change most when things go wrong. Additionally, regulation always has intended and unintended consequences.  Sarbanes Oxley is an example of this overstepping, raising the cost of reporting in the US well beyond costs internationally. These rules almost single handedly shifted IPO issuance from New York to London and Hong Kong.

One regulation, Reg FD, is seen as the fair-haired child of SEC regulation, since it truly exhibits the spirit of the open access to information, while not raising the cost of information transmission greatly.  Reg FD is in place to constrain the selective flow of material non-public information to a limited number of recipients.  As such, it has leveled the information playing field for all investors and also reduced the informational alpha of new information.

However, an article on Reg FD in Directorship, a publication that discusses boardroom intelligence, depicts the unintended impact of the legislation. In short, the board, faced with providing negative guidance to a few savvy investors holding large stakes in the company compared to the investor population as a whole, might decide not to disclose the guidance at all rather than accept the legal risk of selective information flow.

The article suggests that the dialogue between the board and the large shareholders has been dampened by this concern.

Posted at 11:11 am by Thomas Hutchinson
Make a comment  

Next Page