New York—Bear
Stearns Equity Research recently released a report on XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language), an electronic coding language
designed
to facilitate the use of financial and non-financial information from press
releases and financial statements.
Although XBRL is currently used by only 54 US companies on a voluntary
basis, the Bear Stearns report suggests that the SEC will make XBRL reporting
mandatory. If so, this will provide a
boost to the adoption of RIXML (Research Information Markup Language), which
provides standardization for the distribution of investment research.
Background
XBRL is designed to create a consistent set
of tags on financial data so that users can select financial and non-financial information
from press releases, 10-Qs, and 10-Ks. To work, companies must first adopt XBRL
in their financial reporting process and “tag” data in the filings with
XBRL. XBRL was first proposed and
created in the United States in the late 1990s and is being developed by XBRL
International, a not-for-profit consortium of approximately 550 companies and
agencies worldwide which are creating an international open standard.
Here’s an example of how XBRL works. Assume that a company released its 10K with
XBRL. An analyst builds a cell into Excel or other software that is
automatically linked to the XBRL tag for net income (usfr-pte:NetIncome). As a result, the data automatically links to
this code and imports the information into the spreadsheet. There is no manual
entry and no data vendor intermediaries.
The analytic process begins immediately after a filing’s release rather than
being delayed by the information collection process.
Implications
The benefits to analysts on both the buy
and sell side are clear cut. As the Bear
Stearns report states, XBRL makes the financial information collection process “faster,
cheaper and more accurate.” The view
from financial information data providers is more nuanced. Bear Stearns cites two issues with commercial
databases:
Some
analysts collect financial information directly from financial filings, while
others simply download information from fee-based databases such as FactSet or
Bloomberg. Whether analysts collect the data themselves or outsource data
collection to database providers, this information is prone to the same common
types of problems and errors that affect its reliability and relevance. First, there
is the collection time delay between when information is released by companies
and when it is manually entered into spreadsheets and databases. Further, data
collectors often misidentify or mistype information.
The other issue is cost. If XBRL makes the process faster and more
accurate, why continue to pay for third party data? For now the answer is coverage and convenience,
but over time these advantages dissipate.
Analysts get other information from data vendors than just financial
statement information, so mandatory adoption of XBRL will not result in a wave
of Bloomberg or Factset cancellations.
It will have more impact on specific products focused on financial
statement information, such as Thomson’s Worldscope, S&P’s Compustat, and Hemscott
Data. There will be ripple effects on other
financial statement related businesses such as investor relations data
providers and earnings estimate distributors.
SEC Status
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Chairman Christopher Cox has been a big booster of XBRL throughout his
tenure. The SEC has publicly stated that
it is “committed to transform its vast database of financial information
nicknamed EDGAR, into interactive data format.” On September 25, 2007, Chairman Cox announced
the completion of the initial draft of the United States Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (US GAAP) XBRL taxonomy.
As a result, there are now approximately 15,000 standardized tags that
can be applied to digitalized financial content. Previously there were only about 2,500 tags
available, thus there was a greater need for companies to create their own tags
for information where standard tags did not exist.
Will the SEC now make XBRL mandatory? John
W. White, the Director of the SEC Division of Corporate
Finance, the area responsible for managing the filing of financial statements,
commented in June 2007:
“While
these filers [Voluntary Filing Program members] are using XBRL on a voluntary
basis, the future obviously could hold a requirement that tagged data be used
in public company filings with the SEC. For my part, the Division of Corporation
Finance will continue to be a key player in the SEC's work with XBRL. If the
time becomes appropriate, we stand ready to draft the needed rules requiring
tagged filings.”
It is likely that the SEC will make XBRL
mandatory (although as with many areas of Cox’s SEC, timing is a question.) What is also unclear is whether XBRL will be
required for the entire financial statement or simply the most commonly used
portions. XBRL has the ability to
standardize the juicier parts of financial statements, notably the footnotes
and management discussion. Some of the
research firms we track derive significant value by mining the footnotes, particularly
the forensic accounting and earnings quality specialists. If XBRL is applied to the full financial
statements, some of these providers will be impacted.
Conclusion
As with an increasing number of regulatory
issues, the US is falling behind other regulatory domiciles. XBRL is yet another example. Although first developed in the US, adoption
of XBRL is growing faster in some non-US jurisdictions. To cite one example, as of September 2005, more
than 800 companies in China used the XBRL taxonomies developed by the Shanghai Stock
Exchange to report their 2005 half-year reports. Since the US has only 54 companies (out of
10,000) currently reporting, Bear Stearns snarkily calculates that China had
approximately 16 times more filers in 2005 than the U.S. currently has.
Once the SEC does mandate XBRL, one of the
beneficiaries will be RIXML, the open standard for the distribution of
research. RIXML is a cousin to XBRL since
it provides similar benefits for the downstream distribution of investment
research. Once the buy side analysts are
busy adding XBRL tags to their worksheets, they will also be looking to add
RIXML tags for earnings estimates and other research items. The RIXML organization, a consortium of buy
side and sell side organizations which are creating a common taxonomy for investment
research, recently announced a new executive director, Jack Roehrig, who joins
from Merrill where he managed the electronic distribution of Merrill’s
investment research. The best thing for
Roehrig and the RIXML consortium would be for Cox to follow through on his promises…
Posted at 07:44 am by Sanford (Sandy) Bragg
